The newsletter is posted at http://www.fakr.noaa.gov/npfmc/newsletters/NEWS1007.pdf
There is a lot of information in this newsletter regarding salmon bycatch, crab rationalization, call for nominations and appointments, socioeconomic data collection, polock trip limits, arrowtooth MRA’s, COA Pacfic Cod sector splits and much more.
They had the following to say about the halibut issues:
Charter Halibut
The Council received a number of reports related to charter
halibut fishery management, including reviews by its SSC of two
reports by ADF&G Sport Fish Division staff on charter halibut
discard mortality data and estimation procedures for charter
halibut, demersal shelf rockfish, and shark harvests. SSC
comments are posted on the Council’s website.
The Council reviewed final estimates of 2006 charter halibut
harvests by ADF&G Sport Fish Division staff. The Area 2C
charter harvest was 1.804 M lb, which is 26 percent over the Area
2C GHL of 1.432 M lb. The final estimate is about 225,000 lb
lower than last year’s projection of 2006 harvest. Last year’s
projection was high by 12.4 percent. The Area 3A charter harvest
was 3.664 M lb, which is 0.37 percent over the Area 3A GHL of
3.650 M lb. The final estimate for Area 3A is about 284,000 lb
lower than last year’s projection of 2006 harvest. Last year’s
projection was high by 7.7 percent. The differences between the
projections and final estimates are due almost entirely to
differences in the numbers of fish harvested.
The Council reviewed a draft analysis of proposed measures to
reduce charter halibut harvest to the Area 3A GHL of 3.65 Mlb.
The Council also reviewed a supplemental analysis that
incorporated the final 2006 harvest estimates. The Council
approved release of the analysis to the public and scheduled final
action in October 2008, after final 2007 charter halibut harvests
will be released by ADF&G. Potential management measures
include: (1) No more than one trip per charter vessel per day; (2)
No harvest by skipper or crew and a limit on the number of lines
to not exceed the number of paying clients; (3) Annual limits of
four fish, five fish, or six fish per charter angler; (4) Reduced bag
limits of one fish per day in May, June, July, August, September
or for the entire season; (5) Requiring one of two fish in a daily
bag to be larger than 45 inches or 50 inches; or (6) Requiring one
of two fish in a daily bag to measure less than, or equal to, 32
inches, 34 inches, or 36 inches. The public review draft of the
analysis will be available in August 2008. The Council
recommended, that the ADF&G Commissioner issued, an
emergency order for 2008 for the same line limits and prohibition
on retention of halibut by charter skippers and crew as was
implemented in 2007 in Area 3A.
The Council reviewed a preliminary analysis of options to set an
allocation between the charter and commercial halibut sectors and
options for a compensated reallocation program, in which a
Federal, State, regional non-profit, or individual entity would be
allowed to purchase commercial halibut quota shares (QS) for use
in the charter sector. Elements of the compensated reallocation
program were sent to the Halibut Stakeholder Committee as part
of its development of a permanent solution to the growth in the
charter halibut sector during its meeting on October 30 through
November 1 in Anchorage.
The Council replaced the compensated reallocation approach with
a market-based reallocation approach in the current analysis. The
initial charter allocation would be a common harvest pool for all
charter moratorium permit holders. The charter allocation would
not be a hard cap that would result in closing the fishery when the
charter allocation is exceeded. Instead, the “buffered hard capâ€
would address each year’s overage in subsequent years through
an annual regulatory analysis of management measures that
take into account the projected CEY for the following year
and any overages by the charter industry in the past year.
This will result in the charter industry “paying back†the
commercial industry by the number of pounds by which it
exceeded its allocation in a future year. In factoring such
payback into its subsequent allocations, the Council will not
revisit or readjust the sector split. An allocation overage
would trigger the regulatory process automatically, in
contrast with current GHL management. Any underages
would accrue to the benefit of the halibut biomass and
would not be reallocated or paid forward.
The annual regulatory analysis would examine a suite of
potential measures in its management toolbox. The Council
identified two tiers of measures to manage the charter
common pool for a season of historic length. Tier 1
measures include: (1) One trip per vessel per day; (2) No
retention by skipper or crew; (3) Line limits; (4) Second fish
of a minimum size; and (5) Second fish at or below a
specific length. Tier 2 measures would be analyzed if staff
identifies in the preparation of the analysis that Tier 1
options are inadequate to constrain harvest by the charter
common pool to its allocation. These include (1) Annual
catch limits; (2) 1 fish bag limit for all or a portion of the
season; and (3) Season closure on either monthly or subseasonal
basis. Specific suboptions that were analyzed in
previous GHL analyses would be included.
Due to the lag in implementation after an overage,
management measures will, in general, be slightly more
restrictive than necessary for conservation purposes. In
providing predictability and stability for the charter sector, it
is likely that charter fish may be left in the water. Individual
moratorium permit holders would be allowed to lease
commercial halibut IFQ, or use the IFQ resulting from
commercial QS already in their possession, to allow their
clients relief from those regulations that would be
implemented for the common pool, so long as that relief did
not result in less restrictive regulations than in place for
unguided anglers. The qualification criteria to hold
commercial QS would not be changed to allow charter
moratorium permit holders to purchase QS for use in the
charter sector.
Staff will provide a report on recordkeeping,
implementation, and enforcement issues related to the
proposed allocation/market-based reallocation program in
December 2007. Initial review of the analysis is scheduled
for February 2008, with final action scheduled for 2008.
Implementation would likely not occur prior to 2010 to
facilitate implementation of the moratorium program in
2009, at the earliest. The Stakeholder Committee will also
report on its recommendations for a permanent solution,
along with comments on the market-based approach
outlined above, and elements of the compensated
reallocation program that were not moved forward by the
Council in October. The Council’s motion and committee
meeting material will be posted on the Council’s website.
Staff contact is Jane DiCosimo.
Â
The DEcember meeting will be preliminary review to answer questions staff raises regarding the allocation and interim marketbased transfer of IFQ’s and for the Council to receive the STakeholder committee report on the long term plans with compensated reallocation.
The Council now expects the allocation initial review to occur in Feb. and final decision at the April Council Meeting.